Should nations be afforded territorial sea rights and exclusive economic zones around artificial islands?

This 45-minute lesson is designed to help students explore historical events (land claims in Antarctica) in context of a persistent issue throughout history: national sovereignty v. international law. Students will develop skills and habits of mind associated with thinking critically about visual information. The lesson features a three-part teaching strategy. First, you’ll lead an informal class-wide conversation that culminates in an open-ended question; Second, you’ll support students as they interpret a historical photograph; Third, you’ll encourage students to begin to answer the question.

PART 1: THE CONVERSATION (10 minutes): Try initiating a seemingly impromptu conversation by asking the class: “What do you think of Sealand… is it an independent nation or not?” You could provide more information about this 1-acre island about 6.5 nautical miles east of Suffolk, England in the North Sea. It is a self-proclaimed “sovereign nation.” It has its own constitution, national flag, national seal, and it even has its own passport. It is a constitutional monarchy ruled by Prince Michael. This is an example of a “micronation,” a group that claims to meet all of the criteria for being acknowledged as a sovereign nation, but do not have formal recognition from other nations. While students share their thoughts aloud, you can negotiate responses by categorizing them into broader themes such as what exactly constitutes “a sovereign nation,” and “what logistical concerns (i.e., property ownership, currency) are raised when a region wishes to be independent from another nation?” Together, the class may want to create a list of criteria a sovereign nation must meet. Remember: this is not intended to be a lengthy, formal discussion. Rather, it’s a brief grabber to gather students’ interest. Be mindful of your time and stay focused.

Problem-based historical inquiry* (PBHI) is an approach to teaching students about the past. One of the tenets of PBHI is that learning should be purposeful lessons should be centered around open-ended, societal concerns that call for students to engage in real-world problem-solving, make decisions, and act. Lessons should afford students sufficient time for sustained focus on content and skills and to think deeply and seriously about facts, definitions, and values. Instead of memorizing information from a textbook or lecture, students have a more authentic purpose with PBHI: deep, sustained learning and struggling with problems of the past to more meaningfully address problems of their present and future.
Which of the two compelling questions presented in this lesson would you center instruction around? Why?
* Callahan, C., Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2013). Designing web-based educative curriculum materials for the social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2).
As the conversation wanes, you can share that today students are going to explore, not the facts about Sealand, but about the global concerns surrounding islands—natural and artificial—and their sovereignty and access to their resources. “Should nations be afforded territorial sea rights and exclusive economic zones around artificial islands?” could be the question for today; however, you could also choose to focus on the larger question: “What’s the proper balance between national sovereignty and international law?” These are the open-ended questions around which this problem-based historical inquiry (PBHI) activity is centered. The questions work well with the previous conversation and the subsequent learning segments because one of the domains of international law is “territorial seas,” and citizens of many nations throughout the world have had to think through their respective answers. This is truly a persistent issue in world history.

You might also share that today, instead of bookwork, worksheets, or a lecture, students will gather information and take notes from critically analyzing a historical photograph. Thinking deeply about this photograph should help them begin to explore the balance between a what a nation wants to do in its own interest (national sovereignty) and what other nations want it to do (international law or concern). You may want to click HERE to read a helpful one-page “Fact Sheet” from the United Nations that discusses International Law.

As a transition from the conversation and whichever open-ended question you decide to emphasize, you should share with students that the skills they will sharpen today are essential for 21st century citizenship. You can remind students that there are, and will likely always be, people and groups who intentionally use images to influence their decision-making (i.e., how to spend money, who to vote for). You can share that today students will think about a historical photograph, using it as evidence to build a claim about an open-ended question, but they hopefully will be able to take that authentic skill and use it to improve their lives away from school (i.e., as they encounter visual information such as advertisements and social media).

PART 2: THE HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPH (25 minutes): Next, make available to each student a copy of the Student Handout. This is a type of data retrieval chart designed for this lesson and students are strongly encouraged to collect their thoughts on it. Explain that thinking critically about images is very different from casually glancing at them. You might want to draw students’ attention to the handout that, by careful design, concentrates their analysis toward thinking deeply and “historically.”

Once each student has a copy of the data retrieval chart, you should make available the photograph, The famous torii of the temple built over the sea, on the sacred Island of Miyajima, Japan. You could project the photograph as a multimedia presentation slide and have students work together as a whole class. Or you could ask each student to access a digital copy of the photograph and have them work individually. This lesson plan encourages you to have students work in small groups of about four or five; however, it’s your decision how to implement the lesson.

The notion of Multiple Intelligences* may be helpful; it attempts to account for the vast array of human abilities. Schools tend to emphasize mostly reading and writing skills, and while many students succeed in that environment, many do not. This notion argues students deserve a broader vision of education where teachers employ different methodologies to design classroom experiences to reach all students. There are seven separate Multiple Intelligences: linguistic, logical mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. Some criticize the notion because of its minimal scientific precision and empirical evidence. Others find Multiple Intelligences helpful for pluralizing instruction and assessment and for addressing differences in students’ needs.
What are your thoughts about Multiple Intelligences… and in what ways does this lesson attend to them?
* Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY:Basic Books
Regardless of how you make the photograph available to students, you’ll need the Teacher Handout designed specifically for this lesson. It would be best to study the handout well before leading students through this lesson because it’s a primer for the photograph that provides information and a script of talking points for skillfully guiding students in an exploration of how nations tend to deliberate national sovereignty and international law as it relates to territorial seas and exclusive economic zones.

Next, place students into small groups of four or five, it would be best to make these groups prior to the day of the lesson and attend to students’ strengths and potential limitations, personalities, and multiple intelligences. Then, proceed with the analysis of the photograph. Give the groups approximately 10 minutes to think together about the photograph “historically” following the components listed on the Student Handout. It’s very important during this time that you to move about the room, visit with each group, initiate conversations regarding their historical thinking, and offer specific, individualized feedback: this is called scaffolding. Scaffolding is often very helpful for guiding students toward deeper understandings of the content.

After the groups have analyzed the photograph and completed the Student Handout, gather the attention of the whole class and have students from each group share their respective group’s observations, conclusions, and thoughts. Be sure to ask their thoughts about sustainable development, the use of clean energy, and the role of the government to promote those practices. Follow these questions by asking for the rationale underpinning their answers. Go out of your way to ask two or three groups to respond to other group’s findings, thus developing a conversation among the students to help everyone discover and create a meaningful understanding of international law. Carefully negotiate students’ responses and keep this segment of the lesson focused.

PART 3: THE ANSWER (10 minutes): After students have analyzed and discussed the historical photograph, ask them to formally to use the skills built and information gathered from today to address the open-ended question you posited earlier. You could ask students to create and submit a 1-minute video or send you an email with their answer. Or they could write their answer on the back of the data retrieval chart; regardless of what tools students use to answer the question, it’s important that you provide each student with individualized, formative feedback. To produce a truly comprehensive answer to such a complex issue, students will need more than just today’s lesson. Still, they should be able to craft a preliminary answer to the question in regard to one of the domains of international law: territorial seas and
exclusive economic zones.

To enhance learning with visual literacy* you could ask students to interpret historical photographs. Visual information inundates our modern lives (i.e., print and online media, computers, cell phones, t.v., billboards, etc.). Students tend to forge their beliefs and values from images, often accepting them as objective and value free recordings of reality. In this lesson, students are to think deeply about photography and its construction—not depiction—of a reality. Students will analyze angles, lighting, fore and back ground content, symbols employed, cropping and more. Critically deconstructing photos can help develop students’ abilities to reflect on messages coming from imagery.
What experiences do you have, as a teacher and as a student, with interpreting visual images?
* Callahan, C. (2013). Analyzing Historical Photographs to Promote Civic Competence. Social Studies Research and Practice, (8)1

You can end this lesson by reiterating how the skills and habits of mind practiced today have tremendous value in everyday life, especially considering the amount of visual information produced and consumed on social media platforms.